Blade servers have emerged as a viable alternative to Rackmount Servers in Data Centers, providing IT managers with more flexibility in configuring their server environment. As maintenance needs evolve and OEM support warranties expire, the advantages and limitations of both blade and rack-mount systems become apparent. To fully capitalize on the value of these systems, it is crucial to address the challenges that arise in such situations. Engaging a third-party provider that comprehends these challenges and can effectively support both types of systems is essential for prolonging hardware lifespan and achieving a return on investment.
Given the maintenance difficulties associated with rack-mount servers
- Rack-mount servers are designed to last for an extended period, with components that can last up to a decade before failing.
- Despite the potential for individual hardware failures, most rack-mount systems function without problems for a long time.
- Third-party maintenance plans are valuable in extending the life of rack-mount servers and avoiding the disruptive process of replacement.
Analyzing blade servers with a focus on extended maintenance
- Blade servers are installed in rack configurations with shared power supplies and cooling systems, unlike rack-mounted servers that have their own components.
- Blade servers offer a relatively inexpensive and easy-to-install server option.
- The challenge with Blade servers is finding the right balance between cost-effective replacement and expensive maintenance and support plans.
IT managers must carefully consider the maintenance implications of Rack-mount or Blade Servers, regardless of their choice. In both cases, third-party support plans can be beneficial, allowing organizations to derive value from their legacy hardware systems. These plans offer cost-efficiency and provide the necessary support to keep the systems viable, without burdening IT managers with the expenses of an extended warranty from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM).
